<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 506 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121956</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted stay of recovery proceedings initiated by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, directing the Revenue to withhold recovery until appeals are decided. The Settlement Commission deemed the Order-in-Original (OIO) non-est, instructing the original authority to decide the case de novo. The Tribunal found the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s actions unsustainable due to pending appeals and fixed hearing date, scheduling appeals before the Circuit Bench. The Tribunal determined the Assistant Commissioner exceeded jurisdiction by issuing the recovery letter while the matter was pending before the Settlement Commission and the hearing date was set.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:14:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 506 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121956</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted stay of recovery proceedings initiated by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, directing the Revenue to withhold recovery until appeals are decided. The Settlement Commission deemed the Order-in-Original (OIO) non-est, instructing the original authority to decide the case de novo. The Tribunal found the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s actions unsustainable due to pending appeals and fixed hearing date, scheduling appeals before the Circuit Bench. The Tribunal determined the Assistant Commissioner exceeded jurisdiction by issuing the recovery letter while the matter was pending before the Settlement Commission and the hearing date was set.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>