<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 504 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121954</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the impugned order due to the lower appellate authority&#039;s failure to comply with the Tribunal&#039;s remand order. The Tribunal emphasized that the lower authority should have followed its directives and noted that the Revenue did not appeal against the remand order. As a result, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, highlighting the necessity of adhering to legal directives and upholding the rule of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 14:57:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 504 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121954</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the impugned order due to the lower appellate authority&#039;s failure to comply with the Tribunal&#039;s remand order. The Tribunal emphasized that the lower authority should have followed its directives and noted that the Revenue did not appeal against the remand order. As a result, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, highlighting the necessity of adhering to legal directives and upholding the rule of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>