<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 502 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121952</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals. It concluded that provisional assessments for anti-dumping duties are invalid, retrospective levies cannot be recovered under Section 28 of the Customs Act, no duty can be imposed for the interregnum period, and specific exemptions apply to certain importers based on the Designated Authority&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 502 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121952</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals. It concluded that provisional assessments for anti-dumping duties are invalid, retrospective levies cannot be recovered under Section 28 of the Customs Act, no duty can be imposed for the interregnum period, and specific exemptions apply to certain importers based on the Designated Authority&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>