https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121946 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the demand of duty based on burning loss unsustainable due to negligible variations in percentages, lack of evidence of clandestine removal, and exceeding the limitation period. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. en-us Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Oct 2017 12:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121946 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding the demand of duty based on burning loss unsustainable due to negligible variations in percentages, lack of evidence of clandestine removal, and exceeding the limitation period. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121946