https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121937 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order denying a refund for goods treated as accessories under the EPCG scheme, citing failure to properly follow the Supreme Court's parameters. The Tribunal directed a remand to the lower appellate authority for a thorough examination of documents to determine the classification of goods as accessories or spares, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles and providing copies of all relevant documents to the party. en-us Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:23:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121937 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order denying a refund for goods treated as accessories under the EPCG scheme, citing failure to properly follow the Supreme Court's parameters. The Tribunal directed a remand to the lower appellate authority for a thorough examination of documents to determine the classification of goods as accessories or spares, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles and providing copies of all relevant documents to the party. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121937