<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 396 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121929</link>
    <description>The appeal by the Department against the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding the reversal of Cenvat credit and imposition of penalty was allowed. The Commissioner (Appeals) found that the credit note issued by suppliers did not impact the duty paid on inputs, and the credit was unlawfully debited by excise officials without proper investigation. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, emphasizing the necessity of following statutory provisions and due process in matters related to Cenvat credit reversals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:46:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 396 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121929</link>
      <description>The appeal by the Department against the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding the reversal of Cenvat credit and imposition of penalty was allowed. The Commissioner (Appeals) found that the credit note issued by suppliers did not impact the duty paid on inputs, and the credit was unlawfully debited by excise officials without proper investigation. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, emphasizing the necessity of following statutory provisions and due process in matters related to Cenvat credit reversals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>