<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 395 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121927</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the confiscation of Chinese Origin Silk Yarn and the penalty imposed on the appellant. The appellant&#039;s explanation for possessing the yarn was considered reasonable, supported by records from the Co-operative Society. The Tribunal found no evidence of import violation, leading to the conclusion that confiscation and penalty were not sustainable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:40:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 395 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121927</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the confiscation of Chinese Origin Silk Yarn and the penalty imposed on the appellant. The appellant&#039;s explanation for possessing the yarn was considered reasonable, supported by records from the Co-operative Society. The Tribunal found no evidence of import violation, leading to the conclusion that confiscation and penalty were not sustainable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>