<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 377 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121907</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, dismissed the condonation applications for delay in filing the appeal. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding company closure and outstanding dues, the Tribunal found the reasons insufficient to justify the delay. Citing precedents from various benches, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely appeals and noted the appellant&#039;s negligence. Notices served on the Managing Director indicated awareness of the impugned order, yet a significant delay persisted. Consequently, the condonation applications were rejected, resulting in the dismissal of stay applications and appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 11:42:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 377 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121907</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, dismissed the condonation applications for delay in filing the appeal. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding company closure and outstanding dues, the Tribunal found the reasons insufficient to justify the delay. Citing precedents from various benches, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely appeals and noted the appellant&#039;s negligence. Notices served on the Managing Director indicated awareness of the impugned order, yet a significant delay persisted. Consequently, the condonation applications were rejected, resulting in the dismissal of stay applications and appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>