<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 368 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121895</link>
    <description>A Certificate of Origin supporting preferential duty under SAPTA may be disregarded where the stated origin is inconsistent with established facts and no contrary evidence shows the goods were genuinely of that origin. On the record, the import of cloves was treated as not qualifying for concessional assessment because Pakistan was not shown to be their place of origin. The declared transaction value may also be rejected under the Customs Valuation Rules where it is found unreliable, and contemporaneous import data may be used as the assessment basis. The article states that contemporaneous NIDB pricing was accepted as a valid substitute for the declared value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:27:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 368 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121895</link>
      <description>A Certificate of Origin supporting preferential duty under SAPTA may be disregarded where the stated origin is inconsistent with established facts and no contrary evidence shows the goods were genuinely of that origin. On the record, the import of cloves was treated as not qualifying for concessional assessment because Pakistan was not shown to be their place of origin. The declared transaction value may also be rejected under the Customs Valuation Rules where it is found unreliable, and contemporaneous import data may be used as the assessment basis. The article states that contemporaneous NIDB pricing was accepted as a valid substitute for the declared value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>