<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 481 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121889</link>
    <description>A final appellate order recognising duty-free procurement entitlement entitled the 100% EOU to refund of duty paid on LDO procured during the pendency of the dispute. Since the unit was not legally required to pay duty once that entitlement was affirmed and the Revenue did not challenge the earlier order, the payment was refundable. Limitation was computed from the date the entitlement was finally recognised, so the refund claim filed within one year of that order was held to be within time. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed and the refund was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:54:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 481 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121889</link>
      <description>A final appellate order recognising duty-free procurement entitlement entitled the 100% EOU to refund of duty paid on LDO procured during the pendency of the dispute. Since the unit was not legally required to pay duty once that entitlement was affirmed and the Revenue did not challenge the earlier order, the payment was refundable. Limitation was computed from the date the entitlement was finally recognised, so the refund claim filed within one year of that order was held to be within time. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed and the refund was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>