<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 476 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121881</link>
    <description>Transportation-related charges separately shown in the invoice were not includible in assessable value where the applicable valuation rule required such charges to be separately disclosed. The invoice reflected free delivery zone charges along with other fixed charges, and that disclosure satisfied the statutory requirement in force for the relevant period. The later deletion of the separate-disclosure requirement reinforced the view that inclusion of these charges was not justified for the period under consideration, so the demand could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 476 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121881</link>
      <description>Transportation-related charges separately shown in the invoice were not includible in assessable value where the applicable valuation rule required such charges to be separately disclosed. The invoice reflected free delivery zone charges along with other fixed charges, and that disclosure satisfied the statutory requirement in force for the relevant period. The later deletion of the separate-disclosure requirement reinforced the view that inclusion of these charges was not justified for the period under consideration, so the demand could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>