<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 520 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121863</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata, directing a rehearing by the Commissioner (Appeals) to reconsider the matter in light of the CBEC Circular and relevant decisions. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of considering legal provisions and precedents in arriving at a lawful conclusion, highlighting the failure of the Appellate Authority to acknowledge the binding nature of the circular and relevant precedents, leading to the decision being deemed questionable and subject to challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 17:45:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 520 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121863</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata, directing a rehearing by the Commissioner (Appeals) to reconsider the matter in light of the CBEC Circular and relevant decisions. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of considering legal provisions and precedents in arriving at a lawful conclusion, highlighting the failure of the Appellate Authority to acknowledge the binding nature of the circular and relevant precedents, leading to the decision being deemed questionable and subject to challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>