<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 570 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121848</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of the benefit of Notification No. 67/87-Cus. to the appellants for imported &#039;Capacitor Switches&#039; and &#039;Capacitor Banks&#039; intended for rural electrification, as they were not for power generation but for system improvement. The appeal was dismissed due to the failure to establish the intended use in power generation as required by the Notification, emphasizing the necessity to prove goods were intended for power projects generating electricity to qualify for the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:50:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 570 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121848</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of the benefit of Notification No. 67/87-Cus. to the appellants for imported &#039;Capacitor Switches&#039; and &#039;Capacitor Banks&#039; intended for rural electrification, as they were not for power generation but for system improvement. The appeal was dismissed due to the failure to establish the intended use in power generation as required by the Notification, emphasizing the necessity to prove goods were intended for power projects generating electricity to qualify for the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>