<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 404 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121840</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the seizure of bank accounts by the Customs Department, finding the subsequent order justifying the seizure based on duty drawback fraud to be valid. The Court directed the release of the accounts unless a valid order justifying the seizure was passed within a month, emphasizing that it did not assess the new order&#039;s merits to avoid prejudicing the petitioners&#039; remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:30:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 404 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121840</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the seizure of bank accounts by the Customs Department, finding the subsequent order justifying the seizure based on duty drawback fraud to be valid. The Court directed the release of the accounts unless a valid order justifying the seizure was passed within a month, emphasizing that it did not assess the new order&#039;s merits to avoid prejudicing the petitioners&#039; remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>