<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 345 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121794</link>
    <description>The court set aside the confiscation of imported Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil (HVO) consignments and the penalties imposed on the appellants. It was determined that there was no violation of relevant sections of the Customs Act, and the penalties were deemed unjustified as the appellants had acted in good faith. The judgment allowed the appeals and granted consequential relief to the appellants, including the return of the redemption fine paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 13:22:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 345 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121794</link>
      <description>The court set aside the confiscation of imported Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil (HVO) consignments and the penalties imposed on the appellants. It was determined that there was no violation of relevant sections of the Customs Act, and the penalties were deemed unjustified as the appellants had acted in good faith. The judgment allowed the appeals and granted consequential relief to the appellants, including the return of the redemption fine paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>