https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121756 The Tribunal determined that the appellant's arrangement was a buy-back, not job work, and the Supreme Court decision on job work did not directly apply. The pre-deposit requirement was upheld as the appellants failed to show financial hardship. The Tribunal rejected the stay petitions, directing the appellants to pre-deposit the duty amount within four weeks. Compliance was required by a specified date, and the stay petitions were disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 28 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Aug 2012 11:18:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121756 The Tribunal determined that the appellant's arrangement was a buy-back, not job work, and the Supreme Court decision on job work did not directly apply. The pre-deposit requirement was upheld as the appellants failed to show financial hardship. The Tribunal rejected the stay petitions, directing the appellants to pre-deposit the duty amount within four weeks. Compliance was required by a specified date, and the stay petitions were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121756