<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 423 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121751</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, determining that the deletion of the addition by the CIT(A) was incorrect. The Tribunal held that the reduction of the opening stock was not in accordance with standard accounting practices and that Section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applied, leading to the amount being treated as income of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 10:50:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 423 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121751</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, determining that the deletion of the addition by the CIT(A) was incorrect. The Tribunal held that the reduction of the opening stock was not in accordance with standard accounting practices and that Section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applied, leading to the amount being treated as income of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>