https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121746 The appeal was initially dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit order but was remanded by the Supreme Court for further consideration. The appellant, a civil contractor, faced allegations of short levy of duty on construction materials. The dispute over dutiability was settled in the appellant's favor based on previous adjudication and appellate orders. The valuation dispute was resolved in favor of the appellant, who argued the goods were undervalued. The Commissioner's orders were accepted by the revenue. The demand under the notice dated 18-6-2004 was found time-barred, leading to the appeals being allowed and the impugned order set aside. en-us Wed, 23 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Aug 2012 10:41:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121746 The appeal was initially dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit order but was remanded by the Supreme Court for further consideration. The appellant, a civil contractor, faced allegations of short levy of duty on construction materials. The dispute over dutiability was settled in the appellant's favor based on previous adjudication and appellate orders. The valuation dispute was resolved in favor of the appellant, who argued the goods were undervalued. The Commissioner's orders were accepted by the revenue. The demand under the notice dated 18-6-2004 was found time-barred, leading to the appeals being allowed and the impugned order set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121746