<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 442 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121737</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, rejecting the inclusion of service charges to MSTC but remanding the matter regarding landing and stevedoring charges for fresh assessment in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Coromandal Fertilisers Ltd. v. Collector of Customs. The appellant did not contest the inclusion of insurance charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 18:31:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 442 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121737</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, rejecting the inclusion of service charges to MSTC but remanding the matter regarding landing and stevedoring charges for fresh assessment in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Coromandal Fertilisers Ltd. v. Collector of Customs. The appellant did not contest the inclusion of insurance charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>