<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 428 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121719</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, setting aside the duty demand and detention notice proceedings under Section 142 of the Customs Act. The demand for payment of customs duty was deemed time-barred as the extended period of limitation was not invoked, and the notice did not provide grounds for such invocation. The Tribunal found the detention notice proceedings unsustainable and ordered the Department to proceed in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:19:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 428 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121719</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellants, setting aside the duty demand and detention notice proceedings under Section 142 of the Customs Act. The demand for payment of customs duty was deemed time-barred as the extended period of limitation was not invoked, and the notice did not provide grounds for such invocation. The Tribunal found the detention notice proceedings unsustainable and ordered the Department to proceed in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>