<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 495 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121688</link>
    <description>Import of second-hand photocopiers after the Foreign Trade Policy amendment requiring a specific licence was treated as unauthorised, and a plea of bona fide belief was rejected because the restriction was express. In fixing redemption fine under the Customs Act, the Tribunal held that a market enquiry was not the relevant basis for second-hand machines; instead, a reasonable benchmark linked to the enhanced value could be applied. On that basis, the redemption fine and penalty were found to be below the comparable benchmark and were enhanced accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:23:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 495 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121688</link>
      <description>Import of second-hand photocopiers after the Foreign Trade Policy amendment requiring a specific licence was treated as unauthorised, and a plea of bona fide belief was rejected because the restriction was express. In fixing redemption fine under the Customs Act, the Tribunal held that a market enquiry was not the relevant basis for second-hand machines; instead, a reasonable benchmark linked to the enhanced value could be applied. On that basis, the redemption fine and penalty were found to be below the comparable benchmark and were enhanced accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>