<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 482 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121672</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue against the order setting aside the original order was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai. The Tribunal found in favor of the respondent concerning a refund claim related to Central Excise duty. It was determined that the burden of excess duty had not been passed on to customers, as evidenced by the documents provided by the respondent. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of evidence from the Revenue to counter the respondent&#039;s claim, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and disposal of the Cross-Objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:15:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 482 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121672</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue against the order setting aside the original order was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai. The Tribunal found in favor of the respondent concerning a refund claim related to Central Excise duty. It was determined that the burden of excess duty had not been passed on to customers, as evidenced by the documents provided by the respondent. The Tribunal highlighted the lack of evidence from the Revenue to counter the respondent&#039;s claim, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and disposal of the Cross-Objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>