<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 568 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121662</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation order, redemption fine, and penalty imposed on imported goods due to misdeclaration of country of origin. Despite the misdeclaration, as the duty amount remained unaffected and the goods were genuinely from the declared country, the intent to evade payment was not established. The appellant&#039;s appeal against the confiscation was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:44:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 568 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121662</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation order, redemption fine, and penalty imposed on imported goods due to misdeclaration of country of origin. Despite the misdeclaration, as the duty amount remained unaffected and the goods were genuinely from the declared country, the intent to evade payment was not established. The appellant&#039;s appeal against the confiscation was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>