<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 509 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121648</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a complete waiver of pre-deposit of duty drawback and penalties imposed on the appellants, with recovery stayed pending the appeal. The majority opinion found a prima facie case in favor of the appellants due to discrepancies in evidence and foreign exchange remittances, leading to the decision for a waiver of pre-deposit. Despite a dissenting opinion requiring a pre-deposit of Rs. 25 lakhs based on sufficient evidence against the appellants, the majority order favored the complete waiver and stay on recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 12:33:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 509 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121648</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a complete waiver of pre-deposit of duty drawback and penalties imposed on the appellants, with recovery stayed pending the appeal. The majority opinion found a prima facie case in favor of the appellants due to discrepancies in evidence and foreign exchange remittances, leading to the decision for a waiver of pre-deposit. Despite a dissenting opinion requiring a pre-deposit of Rs. 25 lakhs based on sufficient evidence against the appellants, the majority order favored the complete waiver and stay on recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>