https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121641 For a sensitive ex-cadre post, the Tribunal held that consideration of the applicant's inclusion in the Agreed List as relevant suitability material did not amount to punitive action and did not require a separate prior hearing; the natural justice challenge was rejected. It further held that selection and initial approval by the Appointments Committee of Cabinet did not create a vested or enforceable right to appointment in the absence of a final appointment order, and the Government could reconsider the matter when the Agreed List information came to light. The annulment of the earlier approval was therefore sustained. en-us Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Aug 2012 12:12:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121641 For a sensitive ex-cadre post, the Tribunal held that consideration of the applicant's inclusion in the Agreed List as relevant suitability material did not amount to punitive action and did not require a separate prior hearing; the natural justice challenge was rejected. It further held that selection and initial approval by the Appointments Committee of Cabinet did not create a vested or enforceable right to appointment in the absence of a final appointment order, and the Government could reconsider the matter when the Agreed List information came to light. The annulment of the earlier approval was therefore sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121641