<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 537 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121640</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 9,21,803 imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, finding that the assessee did not conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars. The assessee&#039;s explanations regarding interest disallowance under section 14A were deemed bona fide and substantiated. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, ruling that the penalty provisions were not applicable in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2023 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 537 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121640</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 9,21,803 imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, finding that the assessee did not conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars. The assessee&#039;s explanations regarding interest disallowance under section 14A were deemed bona fide and substantiated. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, ruling that the penalty provisions were not applicable in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>