<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 536 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121636</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals by upholding the validity of the reopening under section 148. It determined that the non-compete fees/commission should be taxed as &quot;business income&quot; under section 28(va) on a cash basis. Additionally, it ruled that the use of different accounting methods was permissible and not a tax avoidance strategy. The Tribunal deemed the additional ground regarding interest charge under section 234B as irrelevant due to the main ground decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 11:53:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 536 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121636</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals by upholding the validity of the reopening under section 148. It determined that the non-compete fees/commission should be taxed as &quot;business income&quot; under section 28(va) on a cash basis. Additionally, it ruled that the use of different accounting methods was permissible and not a tax avoidance strategy. The Tribunal deemed the additional ground regarding interest charge under section 234B as irrelevant due to the main ground decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>