https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121624 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving duty evasion through clandestine removal of goods without payment. The appellants successfully argued that duty liability on job work products should fall on the raw material-supplier, not them, as per Notification No. 214/86. The Tribunal found the duty demand was a result of the raw material-supplier's non-compliance with duty payment for home consumption, thereby setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals). en-us Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Nov 2017 12:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121624 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving duty evasion through clandestine removal of goods without payment. The appellants successfully argued that duty liability on job work products should fall on the raw material-supplier, not them, as per Notification No. 214/86. The Tribunal found the duty demand was a result of the raw material-supplier's non-compliance with duty payment for home consumption, thereby setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals). Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121624