<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 415 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121614</link>
    <description>Clearances may be treated as provisional assessment under Rule 7 where duty liability cannot be finally determined at the time of removal and the assessee&#039;s conduct, prior practice, bond, bank guarantee, and written intimation to the department show that provisional assessment was being followed. The absence of a formal order is not decisive on these facts. Once the assessments are provisional, show-cause notices premised on final assessment cannot stand; the proper course is finalisation of assessment by the competent officer in accordance with law and natural justice. The notices and consequential proceedings were therefore quashed and the matter remanded for final assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:14:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 415 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121614</link>
      <description>Clearances may be treated as provisional assessment under Rule 7 where duty liability cannot be finally determined at the time of removal and the assessee&#039;s conduct, prior practice, bond, bank guarantee, and written intimation to the department show that provisional assessment was being followed. The absence of a formal order is not decisive on these facts. Once the assessments are provisional, show-cause notices premised on final assessment cannot stand; the proper course is finalisation of assessment by the competent officer in accordance with law and natural justice. The notices and consequential proceedings were therefore quashed and the matter remanded for final assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>