<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 412 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121611</link>
    <description>The Hon&#039;ble High Court of Allahabad overturned the Tribunal&#039;s interim order and directed a fresh decision on the application under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal&#039;s order for a pre-deposit of Rs. 30 lacs was upheld, with serious allegations against the counsel for unauthorized actions related to the deposit. The Tribunal found the earlier order valid and rejected the rectification application, emphasizing that the deposit statement was made based on client instructions. The Tribunal also referred the matter to the Bar Council of Delhi for necessary action regarding the serious allegations among the involved advocates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:54:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 412 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121611</link>
      <description>The Hon&#039;ble High Court of Allahabad overturned the Tribunal&#039;s interim order and directed a fresh decision on the application under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal&#039;s order for a pre-deposit of Rs. 30 lacs was upheld, with serious allegations against the counsel for unauthorized actions related to the deposit. The Tribunal found the earlier order valid and rejected the rectification application, emphasizing that the deposit statement was made based on client instructions. The Tribunal also referred the matter to the Bar Council of Delhi for necessary action regarding the serious allegations among the involved advocates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>