<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 409 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121605</link>
    <description>Interest could not be fastened on reversal and re-credit of Modvat entries in RG 23C Part II without first determining the legal character of the debit and credit entries. CESTAT noted that such accounting entries are not automatically equivalent to duty for interest purposes under the Central Excise Act, and that the lower appellate authority had not examined this point. The matter was therefore remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication after hearing both sides and deciding whether any interest liability arose, and if so, for what period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:34:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 409 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121605</link>
      <description>Interest could not be fastened on reversal and re-credit of Modvat entries in RG 23C Part II without first determining the legal character of the debit and credit entries. CESTAT noted that such accounting entries are not automatically equivalent to duty for interest purposes under the Central Excise Act, and that the lower appellate authority had not examined this point. The matter was therefore remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication after hearing both sides and deciding whether any interest liability arose, and if so, for what period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>