<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 525 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121604</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 11,24,04,000 for service warranty provisions under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act. It determined that the provision was a legitimate business expense, calculated using historical data and scientific methods, thus constituting a definite liability rather than a contingent one. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the liability was reasonably estimable and consistent with commercial practices and accepted accounting principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2023 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 525 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121604</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 11,24,04,000 for service warranty provisions under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act. It determined that the provision was a legitimate business expense, calculated using historical data and scientific methods, thus constituting a definite liability rather than a contingent one. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the liability was reasonably estimable and consistent with commercial practices and accepted accounting principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>