<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 524 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121601</link>
    <description>Income from sale of completed flats was treated as accruing when possession had been handed over and consideration received, even though the overall project remained unfinished and some ancillary bank or utility obligations were pending. The project completion method did not defer tax on units already completed for sale, but the assessee&#039;s business-related bank liability had to be verified and factored into the true profit computation. Alleged unaccounted cash receipts over and above sale consideration were not finally established on the existing record, so the additions required fresh examination of the agreements, special audit material, and supporting evidence after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 524 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121601</link>
      <description>Income from sale of completed flats was treated as accruing when possession had been handed over and consideration received, even though the overall project remained unfinished and some ancillary bank or utility obligations were pending. The project completion method did not defer tax on units already completed for sale, but the assessee&#039;s business-related bank liability had to be verified and factored into the true profit computation. Alleged unaccounted cash receipts over and above sale consideration were not finally established on the existing record, so the additions required fresh examination of the agreements, special audit material, and supporting evidence after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>