<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 511 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121589</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, remitting the issue of interest income back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. It directed the recalculation of the section 80HHC deduction to include the foreign exchange rate difference. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition to the closing stock of finished goods, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal on this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 511 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121589</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, remitting the issue of interest income back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. It directed the recalculation of the section 80HHC deduction to include the foreign exchange rate difference. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition to the closing stock of finished goods, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal on this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>