<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 507 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121570</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for AY 1996-97, directing the AO to verify the claimed loss and adjust the surplus material value in the opening stock of subsequent years. For AY 1997-98, it allowed the provision for leave encashment, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling, and restored the prior period expenditure issue to the AO for verification. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, requiring further verification by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2023 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 507 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121570</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for AY 1996-97, directing the AO to verify the claimed loss and adjust the surplus material value in the opening stock of subsequent years. For AY 1997-98, it allowed the provision for leave encashment, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling, and restored the prior period expenditure issue to the AO for verification. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, requiring further verification by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>