<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 468 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121568</link>
    <description>The appellants contested the classification of &#039;Rice Flakes/Poha&#039; under Heading 1904 of CET, seeking the benefit of Notification No. 08/2001-C.E. despite a significant duty and penalty requirement. They argued for classification under CH 11.01 with a &#039;Nil&#039; rate of duty, citing a Larger Bench judgment in Mahavir Food Products case. The Tribunal granted an Ad Interim Stay against recovery, acknowledging the appellants&#039; strong case and the relevance of the new judgment. The Commissioner was directed to provide comments on the judgment&#039;s applicability, with the matter set for a final hearing and a stay on recovery until resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 468 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121568</link>
      <description>The appellants contested the classification of &#039;Rice Flakes/Poha&#039; under Heading 1904 of CET, seeking the benefit of Notification No. 08/2001-C.E. despite a significant duty and penalty requirement. They argued for classification under CH 11.01 with a &#039;Nil&#039; rate of duty, citing a Larger Bench judgment in Mahavir Food Products case. The Tribunal granted an Ad Interim Stay against recovery, acknowledging the appellants&#039; strong case and the relevance of the new judgment. The Commissioner was directed to provide comments on the judgment&#039;s applicability, with the matter set for a final hearing and a stay on recovery until resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>