<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 459 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121556</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the stay applications, ordering 50% pre-deposit of penalties for most applicants except one, citing undue hardship only for the Dy. Commissioner. The judgment emphasized the seriousness of the fraud related to exports of readymade garments, highlighting the deliberate nature of the fraudulent activities and the active roles played by the individuals and officers involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:43:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 459 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121556</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the stay applications, ordering 50% pre-deposit of penalties for most applicants except one, citing undue hardship only for the Dy. Commissioner. The judgment emphasized the seriousness of the fraud related to exports of readymade garments, highlighting the deliberate nature of the fraudulent activities and the active roles played by the individuals and officers involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>