<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 502 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121549</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the transactions were contracts for the sale of goods, not works contracts, thus Section 194C of the Income Tax Act was inapplicable. Consequently, the assessee was not liable for tax deduction at source (TDS) or interest under Section 201(1A). The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2024 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 502 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121549</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the transactions were contracts for the sale of goods, not works contracts, thus Section 194C of the Income Tax Act was inapplicable. Consequently, the assessee was not liable for tax deduction at source (TDS) or interest under Section 201(1A). The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>