<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 452 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121547</link>
    <description>The judgment allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand of interest on delayed duty payments made without prior notice and remanding the case for correct quantification of interest in accordance with the law, considering the ruling of the Rajasthan High Court. The Superintendent&#039;s letter demanding interest was deemed appealable, and invoking Section 11AB directly was found improper, leading to the decision to remand the case for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:59:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 452 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121547</link>
      <description>The judgment allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand of interest on delayed duty payments made without prior notice and remanding the case for correct quantification of interest in accordance with the law, considering the ruling of the Rajasthan High Court. The Superintendent&#039;s letter demanding interest was deemed appealable, and invoking Section 11AB directly was found improper, leading to the decision to remand the case for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>