<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 448 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121542</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, an Export-Oriented Unit (EOU), in a case concerning duty demand and penalty on capital goods. The Tribunal found that the EOU&#039;s operations with quarry-owners constituted a &quot;mining lease&quot; as defined by the Supreme Court, satisfying the requirements of the Notification. It differentiated the case from previous decisions and granted waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery for the duty and penalty amounts, indicating a favorable outcome for the appellants due to the lack of merit in the duty demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:01:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 448 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121542</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, an Export-Oriented Unit (EOU), in a case concerning duty demand and penalty on capital goods. The Tribunal found that the EOU&#039;s operations with quarry-owners constituted a &quot;mining lease&quot; as defined by the Supreme Court, satisfying the requirements of the Notification. It differentiated the case from previous decisions and granted waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery for the duty and penalty amounts, indicating a favorable outcome for the appellants due to the lack of merit in the duty demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>