<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 566 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121537</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by recalling the Final Order and directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to dispose of the case on merits without requiring predeposit. This decision was made after the Tribunal overlooked a crucial provision in Notification No. 138/2002-Cus., impacting the levy of Anti-Dumping Duty on imported goods. The recall aimed to ensure a fair decision in compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:36:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 566 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121537</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by recalling the Final Order and directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to dispose of the case on merits without requiring predeposit. This decision was made after the Tribunal overlooked a crucial provision in Notification No. 138/2002-Cus., impacting the levy of Anti-Dumping Duty on imported goods. The recall aimed to ensure a fair decision in compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>