<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 562 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121532</link>
    <description>Amended Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 authorised an assessee to use Cenvat credit to discharge liability of additional duty of excise. Notification No. 18/2003-C.E. dated 13-3-2003 brought the amended rules into force from 1-4-2003, and the text confirmed that sub-rule (3) expressly permitted such utilisation. On that basis, the appellate order was left undisturbed and the Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:30:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 562 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121532</link>
      <description>Amended Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 authorised an assessee to use Cenvat credit to discharge liability of additional duty of excise. Notification No. 18/2003-C.E. dated 13-3-2003 brought the amended rules into force from 1-4-2003, and the text confirmed that sub-rule (3) expressly permitted such utilisation. On that basis, the appellate order was left undisturbed and the Revenue&#039;s challenge was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>