https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121509 The penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, was set aside. The appellate authority found the penalty unjustified due to procedural irregularities and lack of clear opportunity for the appellant to address the penalty imposition. The decision focused solely on the penalty issue, refraining from commenting on other aspects of the orders. The judgment concluded in favor of the appellant by setting aside the penalty. en-us Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:02:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121509 The penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, was set aside. The appellate authority found the penalty unjustified due to procedural irregularities and lack of clear opportunity for the appellant to address the penalty imposition. The decision focused solely on the penalty issue, refraining from commenting on other aspects of the orders. The judgment concluded in favor of the appellant by setting aside the penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121509