<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 633 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121494</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, concluding that the assessee-firm was not a registered shareholder of M/s. Jetair Pvt. Ltd., as the shares were held by the partners individually. Consequently, the loans received by the firm could not be treated as deemed dividends under section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act. The additions made by the AO for assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 were deleted, and the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 633 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121494</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, concluding that the assessee-firm was not a registered shareholder of M/s. Jetair Pvt. Ltd., as the shares were held by the partners individually. Consequently, the loans received by the firm could not be treated as deemed dividends under section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act. The additions made by the AO for assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 were deleted, and the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>