<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 508 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121492</link>
    <description>The department sought rectification of a mistake in the final order reducing redemption fines and penalties on appellants. The court found no arithmetical error as claimed by the department, dismissing the applications. Another mistake in assessable values of imported goods was noted, rectified by the court suo motu. The judgment concluded with rectification of the final order to reflect the correct values for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:15:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 508 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121492</link>
      <description>The department sought rectification of a mistake in the final order reducing redemption fines and penalties on appellants. The court found no arithmetical error as claimed by the department, dismissing the applications. Another mistake in assessable values of imported goods was noted, rectified by the court suo motu. The judgment concluded with rectification of the final order to reflect the correct values for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>