<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 505 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121488</link>
    <description>Section 11D of the Central Excise Act was treated as prima facie applicable to persons liable to pay duty who collect amounts in excess of duty assessed or paid, so a person not otherwise liable to pay duty was considered outside its scope. On that basis, the demand under Section 11D against a small-scale exemption claimant was not shown to be sustainable at the pre-deposit stage, and full waiver of pre-deposit was granted with the appeal admitted for hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:00:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 505 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121488</link>
      <description>Section 11D of the Central Excise Act was treated as prima facie applicable to persons liable to pay duty who collect amounts in excess of duty assessed or paid, so a person not otherwise liable to pay duty was considered outside its scope. On that basis, the demand under Section 11D against a small-scale exemption claimant was not shown to be sustainable at the pre-deposit stage, and full waiver of pre-deposit was granted with the appeal admitted for hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>