<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 503 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121485</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of excess MS bars and ingots due to lack of weighment verification, as the excess quantity was minimal. The demand for duty on goods cleared without payment was upheld based on detailed information from loose slips, amounting to Rs. 9480. The penalty imposed was reduced and upheld by the Tribunal for lack of evidence linking short goods to final product manufacturing. The Tribunal dismissed the demand for reversal of credit on inputs found short, as it was not part of the original notice and lacked evidence of use in manufacturing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:54:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 503 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121485</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of excess MS bars and ingots due to lack of weighment verification, as the excess quantity was minimal. The demand for duty on goods cleared without payment was upheld based on detailed information from loose slips, amounting to Rs. 9480. The penalty imposed was reduced and upheld by the Tribunal for lack of evidence linking short goods to final product manufacturing. The Tribunal dismissed the demand for reversal of credit on inputs found short, as it was not part of the original notice and lacked evidence of use in manufacturing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>