<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 547 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121480</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the revenue&#039;s and the assessee&#039;s appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. It held that the application of Sections 143(3) and 145(3) was incorrect, labor charge receipts should be included in business profits for Section 80HHC, and head office expenses should be allocated to the eligible unit for Section 80-IB deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 547 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121480</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the revenue&#039;s and the assessee&#039;s appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. It held that the application of Sections 143(3) and 145(3) was incorrect, labor charge receipts should be included in business profits for Section 80HHC, and head office expenses should be allocated to the eligible unit for Section 80-IB deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>