<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 622 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121445</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a company involved in sea food exports, by excluding the waived bank loan amount of Rs. 10.36 crores from its taxable income for the assessment year 2005-06. It determined that the waiver of the principal loan amount does not constitute taxable income under Section 28(iv) or Section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The waiver was deemed a capital account transaction, not a revenue transaction, and thus not taxable. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 622 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121445</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a company involved in sea food exports, by excluding the waived bank loan amount of Rs. 10.36 crores from its taxable income for the assessment year 2005-06. It determined that the waiver of the principal loan amount does not constitute taxable income under Section 28(iv) or Section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The waiver was deemed a capital account transaction, not a revenue transaction, and thus not taxable. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>