<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 524 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121444</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals challenging the rejection of the refund claim for Education Cess, holding that since the primary excise duties were exempted under specified Acts, the Education Cess was also not leviable. The Commissioner (Appeals) orders were set aside, and the appellants were granted consequential reliefs. The judgment was pronounced on June 15, 2007.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=158438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 524 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121444</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals challenging the rejection of the refund claim for Education Cess, holding that since the primary excise duties were exempted under specified Acts, the Education Cess was also not leviable. The Commissioner (Appeals) orders were set aside, and the appellants were granted consequential reliefs. The judgment was pronounced on June 15, 2007.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=121444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>